I say the same about your attachment to TLM. Hey, just keep your tradition and stop questioning NO.
-
-
Replying to @PoliticAlBor
How dense are you this has nothing to do with the Tridentine mass it has to do with correcting errors made in the changes
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CMBCOOL01
Novus Ordo is valid, so it is free of errors. Are there abuses? Sure! But NOvus Ordo is NOT fundamentally flawed theologically.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PoliticAlBor
That's a absolutely wrong there's a difference between valid and licit, the Eastern Orthodox & Sedvicantist masses are valid but not licit
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CMBCOOL01
SSPX masses may or may not be valid...they have priests now that do not belong to a valid episcopal line.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PoliticAlBor
SSPX masses are entirely valid, and are generally accepted as licit
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CMBCOOL01 @PoliticAlBor
Even Francis recognized them as Catholic when he was archbishop in Argentina
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @PoliticAlBor
Neither are non dogmatic statements from pope Francis
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CMBCOOL01
Yup...I personally think that the SSPX and traditionalists should be anathematized...but the holy father does not think so, thus we'll obey
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
you realize this is the church of St. Peter, not liberal Prot-churchtianity right?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
