Two planes of history must be differentiated, the Causal realm of Physical History, and the Moral realm of Universal History.
-
-
Replying to @KANTBOT20K
Cause and effect holds within a certain domain, that of the understanding, but moral principles belong to different domain, of rational will
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @KANTBOT20K
Ideas are massive, they're bundles of possibilities, only things that are limited and particular can exist in the realm of Physical History
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @KANTBOT20K
An idea, as a bundle of infinite potentials, in order to exist, must be limited down to only one of the potentials in order to be
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @KANTBOT20K
Reducing philosophical and moral ideas into the world of Physical History involves limiting them in such ways that evaluation is problematic
1 reply 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @KANTBOT20K
These ideas belong not to Physical but to Universal History, which, in its purest form excludes historical events entirely: Phenomenology
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @KANTBOT20K
The fundamental problem for Marx is that his anthropological ploy to circumvent Transcendental distinction was preempted by early Kantians
2 replies 3 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @KANTBOT20K
"Universal history" is not a Kantian concept. If there was such a thing it would be a priori history but history is by definition empirical.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drbanten
Exactly history is empirical, drawing from Schiller lectures here
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KANTBOT20K @drbanten
but surly you are talking of moral universal history in the Kantian sense and not the quasi-Marxist quasi-Hegelian eschatological universal
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
history of the likes of kojeve and Fukuyama?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.