When a scientific paradigm makes it controversial to believe that qualitative realities like color, sounds, essences, thoughts, & teleology are real and not just subjective interpretations of quantitative units of physical matter, thats just reason to dump the paradigm altogether
-
-
-
-
Wut? Kant was a literal genius, and I don't tend to use this word often.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Wut? Kant was a literal autist, and I use this word very often
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Were you joking lol
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Only partly, I don't subscribe to the Kantian worldview and think it is fundamentally flawed, but I won't seriously defend that Kant had substandard intellectual capabilities
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I see. Which part of Kant's philosophy do you dislike?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
His ethics, for I do not believe that it is impossible for something to be good other than a good will. His ontology, for I find the distinction between the noumenal and the phenomenal insufficient. Also his epistemology, I don't believe all knowledge starts from experience.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Well Nietzsche was correct about his ontology to an extent, and his ethics tbh
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.