Sorry, I don't understand that.
-
I did not mention "enemy". I said your continued broadcast of your mistaken position is harmful to the rest of us trying to make the world a better place. BTW your hashtag plugin makes things worse too as it breaks translations.
#BetterUnited#EndOf
@carlopiana It has been pointed out to me that I didn't share this document which actually describe well what I mean: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html …
Actually, I assumed you knew it well.
It explains that #OpenSource and #FreeSoftware are different.
One is _defined_ by #hackers' #ethics
-
-
Actually, I know that document by heart. My point is different. Operatively they are 2 faces of the same coin. Again, for my efforts to make patents in standards licensed foss-compatible, making that distinction is detrimental. That very argument is used to divide and conquer.
-
@carlopiana I know and appreciate your work. Really! But you forget#programmers and users in your reasoning. The#ambiguity in the mainstream language fools them both. It reduces the#freedom that the licenses grant. Concretely! -
What happens to your
#freedom to#modify if it takes hours to understand how to build the code? And days to build! Such projects are not concretely#FreeSoftware. Even when they use a#GPL license. I agree they are still#OpenSource though. -
-
Stating that there is no difference sound like a will to preserve the
#ambiguity, just to get more#programming#minions for free! But for free, is not for freedom! And I don't think#developers deserve this. We build what you defend! This is what I mean by ethics' orthogonality.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.