This is very cool, wonder what license they chose? #MachineLearninghttps://twitter.com/angelluisdiaz/status/1067772124033622016 …
-
-
Replying to @jeffborek
Data sharing is cool but the "open source" part would seem to be pretty much untrue if you go to the actual site: https://fastmri.med.nyu.edu/ You have to apply for access and "The fastMRI Dataset is considered proprietary to and owned by New York University and NYU Langone Health."
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ghaff @jeffborek
depends on what 'open' means, IBM may have a different definition than Red Hat, but they should be reconciled soon
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @greg_not_so @jeffborek
For code, it’s pretty much established in the open source definition. Data less canonical but a lot of same principles apply.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ghaff @jeffborek
license, open or not, is subject to legal protections for both code and data
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @greg_not_so @jeffborek
Open source licenses effectively work because of copyright. They grant users a greater bundle of rights than the default. Copyright works a bit differently on code and data but same basics apply.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ghaff @greg_not_so
I think there is a role for the
#CDLA from the@linuxfoundation to play. Data sets need the right license.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Agreed. Data (like photos and written text) has somewhat different characteristics and concerns than code. But, as a default, I'd want open licenses for data to mirror the freedoms provided by the 2 major classes of OSS licenses as closely as possible.
-
-
Please check out the
#CDLA and share when able, there are two “flavors” to address most needs. https://cdla.io

0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.