@ggreenwald is blocked
Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @ggreenwald.
-
In reply to Who Does?
@whodoesblog Right, it's incredibly short-sighted - kind of like allowing an omnipotent executive to be built when one trusts the President! -
In reply to So-Called Areum
@KardOnIce@sarahjeong@Sweet5hark Yes, I'm 100% in favor of them refusing to obey unlawful orders and/or blowing the whistle on those. -
In reply to Can Duruk
@can@MattRAllen I can't keep going over the same points. Please check my time-line where I've discussed this at great length. -
In reply to sarah jeong
@sarahjeong@Sweet5hark Of all the options for resisting Trump, pleading for Deep State rouge intervention is most amoral & naïve. -
In reply to sarah jeong
@sarahjeong@Sweet5hark Yes, since I know the heinous history of IC- the war crimes, atrocities & lies- I want them under democratic control -
In reply to Can Duruk
@can@MattRAllen I wasn't objecting to anyone leaking at all. That wasn't what that tweet was about. -
In reply to Bjoern Michaelsen
@Sweet5hark@sarahjeong Yes, people can blow the whistle publicly, refuse to obey unlawful orders, quit, etc. -
In reply to Bjoern Michaelsen
@Sweet5hark@sarahjeong You feel the CIA & NSA are going to heroically protect the Constitution? This gets to the heart of the matter for me -
In reply to Rosyna Keller
@rosyna What was that tweet about? -
In reply to Howard Jones
@hjoneshojo@EquusontheBuses So rather than call you clairvoyant, I'd call you slothful and confused. -
In reply to Howard Jones
@hjoneshojo Right, and that tweet wasn't discussing anything like what Snowden did, which you'd know if you bothered to see the context -
In reply to Brody
@brody_sv@sarahjeong LOL. Yes, that's not the history of the IC in the US. -
In reply to Amy Hartman
@ameseh The tweet had nothing to do with leaking information. It had to do with NSA withholding info from the President they work for -
In reply to James Vaughan
@EquusontheBuses Whatever else is true, you tore a tweet out of its context and implied it had a much different meaning than it had. -
In reply to sarah jeong
@sarahjeong Having an intel & military apparatus this powerful is dangerous in best of circumstances. Rogue w/no democratic control is toxic -
In reply to sarah jeong
@sarahjeong OK, thanks. Basically: I see nothing in common w/public whistleblowing & IC *secretly subverting* the officials they work for. -
In reply to Pavel Klinov
@klinovp I appreciate the discussion once it moved past your original tweet. -
In reply to Pavel Klinov
@klinovp One person with lots of followers tore the tweet out of context on purpose. From there, lots of people lazily copying him. -
In reply to Amy Hartman
@ameseh You don't understand the tweet. That's what.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Glenn Greenwald