As @U_talkin_2me pointed out, "troll army" is more accurate than "bot army" in the above tweet, since the money went to pay people to attack Hillary critics, not to use computer programs to do so.
Show this thread
David Brock spent at least $1 million in 2016 for a bot army that attacked anyone criticizing Hillary Clinton, and he continues to employ people - at Shareblue & elsewhere - whose only job is to smear journalists or anyone else who criticizes Democratshttp://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.html …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rule of Acquisition #190: Hear all, trust nothing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They absolutely did not see the damage they were causing. The old Clinton method of nuclear war as a campaign technique is a failure in the internet age. Who knew that shaming people into voting would not work? Certainly not Brock or Clinton.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Pizzagate is real.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Damn Russians.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My critique of her campaign doing the Mannequin Challenge got me blocked by
@ericboehlert. He’s so petty.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It worked out so hell for them, too.
-
Not really. The trolls kept it going after the nomination was secured and it backfired in the biggest way possible.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.