Glenn GreenwaldVerified account

Is wanting *evidence* for official accusations of this sort about Russia and the Kremlin evidence of disloyalty or grounds for suspicion?

I am presuming The NY Times is putting credence in this ICA from 2017-01-06. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3254237/Russia-Hack-Report.pdf … Granted, this is not evidence.

But the circumstances and patterns of Russian info warfare elsewhere make it highly plausible.

Lots of things are highly plausible. For instance, it is equally highly plausible that Putin had nothing to do with it.

I wouldn't buy that. The space of authoritarian info warfare that Putin is known to have engaged in is vast. He has attempted...

... similar activity with other countries, and such actions would have aligned well with Putin's interests.

In other words, Putin had motive on both personal and geopolitical grounds.

How is payment from Kremlin coming to sustain your rag that outs whistleblowers

Do you realize that you sound exactly like Joe McCarthy and are happy about it? Or are you ignorant of the similarities?

And if true, it means the NYT has special access but won't show its work...

It's such an extraordinary accusation to adopt and uncritically proclaim without the slightest evidence being publicly available.

So was the hacking of voting machines. Until you published leaked documents that might put a patriot in prison. So doubt away

If there was any "true" evidence on Russian hacks, collusion,etc. it would have been leaked by now. Dems not allow FBI near server

Generally, people don't risk their careers and prison to leak what has already been officially released. So, there's that.

What has "officially"been revealed besides "no evidence". Only left msm items from "anonymous sources " which many were disproven by Comey.

We know the actual names of the hackers. Who are you kidding?

We do?