All financial services ultimately answer to the FDIC and their arbitrary bureaucratic definition of "high risk" transactions. Eliminate FDIC tyranny over financial services and competition will flourish again.
“Just build your own” A comprehensive list of services that Gab has been banned from for defending the fundamental human right to speak freely on the internet and having a TOS that is identical to Twitter’s circa 2007-2015.pic.twitter.com/hJ8p6B3kXN
-
-
-
End the Fed
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, we know. But seems like you like reminding people. Now I’m starting not to care. Dapps are coming. Blockchain is here. Soon a decentralized Twitter will come to web3. Nobody will have tweets deleted or banned. As it’s on blockchain.
-
Delusional. No one will switch over
-
1.) Facebook/Twitter/Google made us social slaves. Many didn’t know it when they signed up years ago. But despite leaks, privacy abuse and all else, people still use their platform. We are the slaves, the products which gets sold to the highest bidder.
-
2.)When someone been a slave their whole lives it ends up as the only thing they know. They don’t know how to be free. FB/Google/Twitter is the only thing ppl know. So yeah many people won’t be free from these corporations.
-
3.)It’s not slavery of the body. But slavery of our lives, our information, our privacy, our mind. Gather information about what we eat, drink, visit, search, read. Humans have a pattern. Then compile a dossier. FB/Google/Twitter should be abolished.
-
4.)So no nobody will leave FB/Google/Twitter. They have, for a lack of a better analogy, the world’s balls by the hand. Even after the analytica scandal, the Netflix scandal and more with enough evidence to show that twitter, google, are evil and yet here we are staying.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Weak argument by a weak mind
pic.twitter.com/i95ZtCiI1KThis media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Another platform can be built, and there are other existing platforms. The problem with GAB is the Founder shot his mouth off at Big Tech. Brilliant move. No different than a rookie QB mouthing off to the Ray Lewis's of the world. Can't feel sorry. You folks asked for it.
-
The founder spoke against the king. And you believe that was wrong. Don't feel sorry for us. Just stay out of our way.
-
How could someone be part of a group that regularly gets censored on the internet and yet condemn those who speak out against Silicon Valley?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Either these companies are utilities, in which case they can't be permitted to discriminate, or they're private companies, in which case they're probably violating some sort of anti-monopoly laws. Not a lawyer, but if I was, I'd probably be checking collusion/racketeering laws.
-
Actually, if they are public utility (platform) they are not allowed to “censor.” If they do, they essentially become a publisher, at which point they become liable for things posted.
-
Like I said, not a lawyer, I just know a couple of things. Please do not use me for legal advice beyond "Find a lawyer."
-
Fair enough. Just wanted to contribute to the conversation.
-
I appreciate your contribution. It corrected some inaccuracies in my own.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.