I get why you might not allow loli but would very much prefer any platform I’m using not to use morality as the basis for decisions. Moralism is pretty much my biggest complaint generally.
-
-
-
It wasn’t. CEO’s personal opinion on the subject and our platform policy on the subject are two separate things. People mixed them both together as one. Platform does not allow because of legal grey area and very high risk. CEO thinks it is degenerate garbage. Both can be true.
-
I getcha. But because the things are seem to be expressed at the same time, they can seem to be connected. Either way, I get your point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
Do they ban everyone who posts loli or just people who post the sexualized stuff
-
Loli in general. From what I’ve gathered. Idiots think Nonon is a Loli.
-
No this is false. We specifically do not allow loli hentai which depicts what are very obviously young children, babies, or toddlers.
-
That’s Toddlercon idiot. Keep waffling. I’ll continue to mock you.
-
lol at the paedophile thinking he can mock anyone
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Because women aren’t allowed to have dissenting opinions apparently.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You can speak out against Loli without being intentionally inflammatory and dishonest. I don't go searching for Loli or Shota, but even I know it's not all "toddlers being raped." Saying, "We don't allow pictures (drawn or otherwise) of sexualized children." Is good enough.
-
Worst part is it aint just loli hentai, which Im fine with them taking away sites not meant for porn anyway and especially not loli porn, its that its all lolis even if its just cute art. Its literally a lolicaust.
-
This is false. It’s loli hentai and we have made this very clear multiple times.
-
It's understandable that you'll ban Loli hentai to avoid legal issues. The way the company responds to users asking for clarification on that, though, is something that needs to be addressed. [...]
-
> It's massively important for Gab to be specifically a Free Speech Social media alternative, not simply a right-wing version of twitter. The pendulum always swings, makes sure it doesn't swing too far.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think people are just obsessed with scratching for a reason to say Gab is not free-speech.
-
I mean, this is hypocritical of them. They claim to support free expression, and then ban a form of expression they find distasteful instead of standing for it. Fiction is fiction, and fiction falls under free expression. No exceptions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Final thing I will say is their is a clear difference between drawn images and photos. If you can't tell the difference between fantasy and reality that's your problem not mine.pic.twitter.com/xCNYeWGZrG
-
Ok but you're still jacking off to children lol
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.