Why would I want to "own" a failed Twitter competitor that can't even get a mobile app? Give it another year or two and you won't even be around anymore. Especially now that you have endorsed thought policing and abandoned free speech.
-
-
-
- Obeying the law - Thought policing That's a good joke. Who knew you'd find leftists on Twitter throwing fits at not being able to share child fetishizing porn?pic.twitter.com/xbC8IJ93He
-
Why do you think he's a leftist?
-
Because I don't pass the ideological purity test.
-
Or you don't pass the "I can read like a normal person" purity test, as leftists typically fail.https://twitter.com/getongab/status/1051519457720381441 …
-
"The home of freedom of speech online" "We don't want to be associated with certain people" If they just advertised as Nazi Twitter, there would be no problem here lol.
-
Why would they advertise as some caricature that caters to your inability to rationalize society doesn't want anything to do with kid fuсking? Hence, laws. Hence, Gab hedging themselves from liability. I know you can't be rational, just enjoy handing you the shovel to dig deeper.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hey Andrew, couple things. Depictions of rape are not endorsements of the action, they are used as a storytelling mechanism. You cannot ascribe modern sensibilities to a non-modern fantasy setting as they do not apply.
-
Also the ages of only 1 character is ever explicitly stated as 15, and they then explicitly state she is an adult IN-WORLD. the purpose is that these are young inexperienced adventurers. Age in this is irrelevant, they could've been in their early 20s and nothing wouldve changedpic.twitter.com/R0fvSfi3qx
-
also to believe that an anime character is the same as a real life human is ridiculous, these are stories and drawings, there are no victims to this, it is fiction and entertainment, and the inability to tell between the two is a sign of psychosis, maybe get yourself checked-out
-
Obviously I don't think you're psychotic, but really dude. I love what you're doing with gab, but you're going the way of the censorious christian wives that wanted to ban everything because it was turning children into "devil worshipers"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Guys, YOU'RE the one who will end up dead on this hill. Just stop it. You can't call yourself the free speech platform and then ban porn you don't like. If you do that, you're a joke.
-
And look I know you're gonna keep dying on the "I think it's CP so it's gotta be" hill, but you just need to understand that you can't win this. You're undeniably banning porn you don't like and claiming it's the law. You can't do that and come out winning. Prioritize, dudes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Imagine thinking that artistic images such as anime are real people. It sounds like 'Gab' forgot to take their psychiatric medications today and wore their tin-foil-hats instead.
@WeaponizedRage@RageGoldenEagle#Animegate#otaku ps, here's a loli for you from a visual novel.pic.twitter.com/R7W3UaNkV1
-
@getongab Oh, here's one more for you!#SayaNoUta#VisualNovel#lolicon#Lolipic.twitter.com/PLVd5bwtD2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's an accurate term.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What the fuck is this NPC language you're using
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You might as well give up trying to explain the law to these knuckleheads.



-
The problem is he's incorrect about the law and using it as an excuse to justify the same 'thought-policing' that was the ENTIRE POINT of creating a Twitter alternative. This has gone full circle and now there's concern other content Andrew doesn't like will have the same fate.
-
He's right about the law.
-
No actually he is not. There's a reason that kind of content can be found all over the clearweb regardless of one's opinion on if it's "evil degenerate filth" or "free expression".
-
Yes, actually it is. So your reasoning is "other people do it" so it must be legal is flawed logic.
-
No, but it is certainly supportive evidence. There are many well-known sites out there that would have been shut down years ago if 'lewd loli' was illegal in the US. Allowing your moral judgement to dictate what you want the law to be is the only flawed logic here.
-
Because they skirt the law and take a chance doesn't support anything. You haven't proved a thing.
-
If I haven't proven anything, you've proven even less. Cite me some convictions over _just_ the possession of 'lewd loli' in the US on a federal level and maybe you can consider yourself correct about the law.
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.