Okay, now let's look at every case that involved school shooters and see how many of them had depictions of violence, either movies or video games, on their computers or in their homes. I guarantee more then 70% do indeed have those things.
-
-
-
I can't see what gab is arguing for here: just like in video games, no one gets turned into a pedophile by lolicon material. It's just that there is no stopping pedophiles from collecting lolicon materials too. Just like there is no stopping school shooters from playing games.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Stfu andrew I’ll lay it down for you A whole 3 persons in total were arrested for cp after having both loli images and cp Now compare that amount to the total amount of persons who possess only pictures of loli and weren’t charged with cp What do you get?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bet they ate bread, too. Lock em up!
-
If gab is arguing for statistics, then 100% those caught with pedophilia material also uses the internet. They also 100% breathe air and drink water.
-
Also, I expect those numbers to be skewed. It's probably 66% of pedos with loli images. Having a cited source would be nice. Wonder why it isnt.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
so we just making up numbers now there was only one case anybody with any kind of iolicon got in trouble. the rest was because other crimes. Not stright lolicon so it 00.1 percent. i saying it illegal elsewhere. means nothing things are illegal elsewhere yet you allow it.
-
And not only that, that one case the guy plea bargained. Didn't even try to defend his rights in court
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There's enough crossover from lolicon to pedophilia that it's not worth the headache. Not all lolicon are pedophiles, but in the words of Eric Cartman, "but most of them are, and all it takes is most."
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The 'video game argument' is literally the only argument loli lovers have, and it's not even valid https://twitter.com/RuaRaptor/status/1052280521722482688 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
No, theres plenty of arguments, although it's pretty hard to believe that the brain views cartoon characters with ridiculous proportions and facial traits the same way as it views real children. Especially considering such people generally aren't interested in real children
-
The sexual system is ancient (obviously). It is the basis for existence of pretty much every living organism more complex than a jellyfish. In mammals, humans included, it deals with sexual arousal. Thanks to our more complex brains most of us can control this urge to some... 1/2
-
degree but there is still a physical reaction to the object of arousal. The play system deals with imagination. A waking nonsexual fantasy is just that to the brain, fantasy. The person you're killing in game does not illicit the physical response killing a real person would have
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Its neither; they simply have no interest 8n actual children. Cartoons are a sharp jump from reality, having features not present in the real world. These people are attracted to such features, not children.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
>cartoon furniture or cartoon robots or cartoon old people They exist too. R34. But you'll have to look deeper around. Follow @/BigBootyWitches and you'll find some of his RTs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
so in 3 cases out of 5, pedophiles like lolicon as well as child porn. if 3 out of 5 cases of blacks arrested for robbery also involved gun possession charges, does that mean every black guy who owns a gun is a thief? Does it justify barring everyone from owning guns?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.