painfully wrong
-
-
-
Painfully not an argument.
-
Using "society as a whole" as the "victim" is also not an argument. Perhaps the reason why there are so many people defending these cartoons is that they see that the law is based on "obscenity" which IS subjective. Nice try defending a law that mirrors "hate speech" laws.
-
Right wing pigs were arresting people for "obscenity" decades before anyone was panicking about racism. These edgy interns think history began in 1994.
-
On the other hand, I could see the FBI using a rarely-enforced law to take out political enemies. This is the kind of law they use. Can't take out every political opponent unless EVERYTHING is a crime.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Everyone's morality is subjective except mine."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
..and law should be clear, not dependent on such subjectivity. Hate speech laws are discriminatory and should be repealed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Eh. Honestly to me i think people shoud be able to draw whatever the hell they want. Yay or Nay!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I don't know what "loli" is, but just as I believe you have a right to censor it on your platform, I believe the fed gov't does not have the authority to legislate about it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't draw muhammad either...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this is like the opposite of sharia law everybody, good grief on the projection there bravo!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They aren't real, but the pedos drooling over them are.
-
and? There are murderers who enjoy violent movies too, but trying to tie media to people acting violently or becoming serial killers has almost universally been found to be bullshit. Especially when it's an animated depiction and not even a flesh and blood person.
-
Yes, but the overwhelming majority of people who enjoy violent movies aren't murderers, 100% of people who enjoy watching lolis are pedos.
-
That is just... entirely inaccurate. Just as there is a gigantic difference between someone enjoying fantasy violence and real violence, there is huge difference between someone who enjoys lolis vs CP. The difference being the same: one is real, the other is not.
-
So you're telling me there are people who enjoy watching sexualized cartoon children aren't pedophiles? I'm sorry but if you're sexually attracted to any kind of child, be it real or cartoon, you're a god damn pedophile.
-
Uh, yeah. You kinda actually have to be attracted to life and blood children to be a pedophile. That's the requirement. Just like you have to kill someone in real life to be a murderer, and not just shoot someone up in GTAV or CoD.
-
Nowhere does this exclude depictions of children. Pedophilia doesn't require a victim, murder does. What kind of people do you think enjoy loli? Anyone who isn't a pedophile would be instantly repulsed by it, not to mention being attracted to it.pic.twitter.com/FKVkWN960K
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.