Tribalism as an analogy works well -- especially during transition periods towards chiefdoms consequent to scarcity -- because physical space affords the same shape of cognition. But...that may not be the common meaning. And, it's really hard to compress.
-
-
Replying to @generativist
Not to get super pedantic here, lol, but this reversed it—the hierarchies induced scarcity not the other way around :) . That said there are plenty of other ideas (cliques, in groups, cognitive dissonance, halo effects, empathy w authority etc which capture the key idea).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yungneocon
So, that's the hard part (as always). I don't think those are good substitutes. But as amalgamation (of those terms):
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist @yungneocon
Tribalism is cliques with cues that afford the generalizable perception of in-groups and out-group which condition cognition and social perceptions in a way that reinforces and generates isolated groups. (Or something.)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist @yungneocon
I guess this does motivate me to find a term more couched upon statistical physics though (which is the real foundation of my model). If we're having this discussion, it kinda means the term doesn't work well even between subject-matter experts.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist
Well homophily tries to somewhat capture it. But also, you have Schellings work in group formation absent individual agency.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yungneocon
Yea. That's true. Homophily + motivated cognition gets close. And, no, not sure I have. Link, please? My section on social power is by far the worst of my dissertation right now...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist
Uhh lemme see. It’s a bit dated both in method & subject matter but basically he showed that racialized spatial stratification doesn’t require conscious prejudice using an evolutionary game theory model.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yungneocon
Oh, wait -- the segregation model?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @generativist
Yeah. The model is problematic bc it’s meant to be somewhat exculpatory but I think it does the exact opposite ( it shows structural racism doesn’t require individual agency)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Ah yea, I have -- I just forgot it applied lol. But yes, pretty relevant here. An impressive model that "makes sense" to either people who want to show either racism is just preferential selection and those who want to demonstrate structural racism absent agency....
-
-
Replying to @generativist @yungneocon
While later researched demonstrated that empirically, it just doesn't work that well.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist
The Schelling model? Yeah I see it has interesting from an intellectual historical perspective but it’s been surpassed subsequently.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.