Been thinking about this thread for days 'cause in papers I do (1) & (2); don't know if I consider tweets the same because it shows likes and not just retweets, but like the thread points out, it's not gonna hurt to cite the secondary source. h/t @generativisthttps://twitter.com/jdmar3/status/976749104549199872 …
-
-
hahaha. Network effects are *so* weird. ;-) But, I'm actually not that into having more followers. Because I think about my audience and don't want to bore people. Better to have a few people into me than a blasé audience. And, I'll never have an academic job. So, whatevs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.