Been thinking about this thread for days 'cause in papers I do (1) & (2); don't know if I consider tweets the same because it shows likes and not just retweets, but like the thread points out, it's not gonna hurt to cite the secondary source. h/t @generativisthttps://twitter.com/jdmar3/status/976749104549199872 …
-
-
The biggest offenders I see, to a person, are academics with high visibility, and they should well know better.
-
Yea. Which is bad. Ignoring how academia works, I want my feed sampling a wide variety of experiences from competent and comprehending people. Failure to cite isn't just about credit. It's a social failure in that introductions that could happen don't.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.