Fields X, Y, and Z work on problem, p. Interpretations X(p), Y(p), and Z(p) are different. But the best in each have lots in common. Established members of each field jealously defend their interpretation or pretend that the rest don't exist. Students grow in artificial nuclei.
Oh, yes. Definitely. I think you have to do that to *decompose* the subjectivity. Like, which parts are emphasized because it's important to our field, and which are emphasized to *obscure* other fields. The latter *shouldn't* happen, but it seems to a lot.
-
-
Like my exposure to sociology & anthropology was minimal for a while working on political science / computational social science dissertation because political scientists have an almost palpable distain for both. Less so now, but still strong upturned noses for qualitative stuff.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.