Fields X, Y, and Z work on problem, p. Interpretations X(p), Y(p), and Z(p) are different. But the best in each have lots in common. Established members of each field jealously defend their interpretation or pretend that the rest don't exist. Students grow in artificial nuclei.
-
-
Thing is without the subjective weights students will not understand the importance of the problem in given space. If both, with subjective weights and without, interpretations are considered together, it might make more sense.
-
Oh, yes. Definitely. I think you have to do that to *decompose* the subjectivity. Like, which parts are emphasized because it's important to our field, and which are emphasized to *obscure* other fields. The latter *shouldn't* happen, but it seems to a lot.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.