2/ Sometime during my dissertation, I started thinking about what compelled me. The abstract search for "what is and is not?" is an obsessive driver. But, it's not the only one.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ I started to realize I wanted Truth as certainty that I was Right. And, I wanted to *Prove *that [political group / policy here] was Wrong.
Show this thread -
4/ That's a dangerous motivation. Empirically- or deductively-derived Truth doesn't give you the "Courage of Your Convictions." It's a *substitute* for courage.
Show this thread -
5/ You learned the difference between right and wrong and how to stand up for the former against the latter sometime before you started to get hair in funny places. Math doesn't help with actual interpersonal conflict part. Certainty doesn't compensate for cowardice.
Show this thread -
6/ And 2017 has demonstrated quite clearly: "What is and is not true" doesn't drive politics. People do.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.