10/ But, selection should get easier. Instead, feels like a teacup filled by a firehose thing.
1/ The way we select open-source libraries for tentative project inclusion is weak.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2/ Go to github; look at stars/forks; look at code coverage; look at issues; look at example code.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
3/ Use those numbers to subjectively classify good/bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4/ But, DVCS allows for so much more than that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
5/ Example statistic I'd be much more curious to see? How many times was a library added, then removed?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
6/ How many branches added a library, but then failed to merge with master?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
7/ Unfortunately, tentative branches don't persist -- it's disappearing codehttps://dispatches.artifexdeus.com/on-disappearing-code-7fa2494203aa …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
8/ But, really -- how much of successful development is using the most appropriate libraries?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
8/ But, how much of successful development is using the most appropriate libraries?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.