Societally, I don't think that's true. It *usually* exists when your voice and what you communicate has no effect...
-
-
Replying to @generativist
you're also comparing children who lack the tools and the Adults who may also lack the full skill set. Not quite the same.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidDanatzko
Bad analogy on my part. Argument about anger stands though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @generativist
strategy for dealing with someone who is violent vs someone rational is drastically different. Civil comes before rational
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidDanatzko
And I don't think "rational" as in logical rationale exists / matters. Rational is: if I do this, I costs me so I won't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @generativist
how else do people decide to change behavior? Randomly?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidDanatzko
They change a behavior has costs > benefits. But, the reason for the change is rationalized after the fact, not rational.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @generativist
for some who never get taught logic sure. But there are plenty who use it regularly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidDanatzko
some people like that exist. I just don't know many. And, to be clear, I know lots of logics and don't consider myslf logical
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
From programming as a child. Then, from math proofs. Then from things like prolog.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.