I didn't read the article. But, it validates my biases. So, I'm tweeting it. That's how twitter works. https://science.slashdot.org/story/16/08/23/2222258/20-of-scientific-papers-on-genes-contain-conversion-errors-caused-by-excel-says-report?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed …
-
-
Replying to @generativist
Haha, love the honesty..
Wonder how often this is the case for references used in scientific papers..?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @Ragniragniragni
98%, according to this buzzfeed article I read!
6:36 AM - 24 Aug 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.