Making behavior legible and subject to empirical analysis is not a unalloyed good. As a downside, it tends to centralize power and authority, and almost inevitably turns the sculpture of what we are back into a big and unrefined block of marble.
-
Show this thread
-
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 Retweeted Chaos
Variance in behavior, beliefs, habits, desires, and intentions is a Good Thing. Turning the dial from a mixture of exploration and exploitation to maximum exploitation assumes and produces stasis.https://twitter.com/chaosprime/status/1248861223501942784 …
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
I've seen (and often been seduced by) arguments along the lines of "let's build a grand consensus engine to filter out all the noise and extract the signal" with various implementation proposals. They're prescriptions for human senescence.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
The brilliance of this website (and very often parts
@jack has defended, whatever his motives may have been) is the messy fucking noise of very low friction expression. That's the engine.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread
...of course, twitter is centralized and flattens us in ways we cannot see.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.