Definitely take "100% test coverage isn't something to aim for" far less seriously than "you'd be surprised how often bugs manifest in code that you think is obviously and simply correct."
-
-
And honestly, if you're writing simulations, 100% coverage almost certainly is something to aim for, actively. And not after the fact, either.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.