My balance for the past few weeks has been somewhere in "breaking out tensorflow doesn't mean you know wtf you're talking about," "you don't need a Ph.D. to know wtf your talking about," and, "people who have spent years on something generally know wtf they're talking about."
-
-
Show this thread
-
But if I say A I'll have people asserting that I reject B or C in my mentions each time and from what I've seen, that's pretty much every epistemological post at this moment.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
who did you yell at now?

-
No one. I'm just reading through posts right now and it's just...reply gunk everywhere.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We have seen this a lot before with climate science, too. In fact, a lot of the so-called "experts" in climate science are also making psuedoscientific claims about this virus, too...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Me: I worked in public health policy, communication, and implementation at the Federal level for 10 years and have an MPH. I now study disease outbreaks and social crisis. Rando: Experts are unnecessary! I do math, so I know better. Me:pic.twitter.com/q4qchSJnRb
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The general issue of knowing who to trust for information when one is not an expert in the field. So far my solution for this is whether or not I intuitively feel I have a deeper understanding of the problem after reading an article. Unfortunately that's very fuzzy criteria.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.