It sounds to me like you should really work for a company that's 100% remote. Just saying...pic.twitter.com/P17cpPRUBm
-
-
-
You’re not wrong...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I read that there was a case of reinfection in Japan, but haven't seen verification.
-
it was probably just unreliable testing
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
High mutation rates are normal with RNA viruses, but I don't think that's the main issue. Even assuming that you get good immunity after being infected (NOT certain at this point!), you don't know for sure that it won't be severe whenever you catch it.
-
Also, we don't yet know if chronic infections are a thing. No evidence of it yet, but the data just isn't in yet. We used to think Ebola couldn't persist, but it later turned out that it does in rare cases.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No one will believe you've had it, or that you're not communicable, for like a month plus. Also, while you have it despite your best intentions you might infect someone at higher risk.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Reports seem to indicate we do not build an immunity and that second infection might have higher risks. Also, potential brain damage even with "mild" cases if the virus cross the blood brain barrier (I'm French, my explanation might be grammatically weird)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
no it's actually not wrong as far as I know, but you obviously risk getting seriously ill and passing it on to others, even if you do isolate yourself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Going remote? Woot
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.