Sorry if this is a silly question, but how do you read : and :: in that statement?
-
-
-
Not a silly question. : “is to” :: “as”
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe? But less a human social form of “bigger”
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
im not sure the analogy holds but the analysis does ^_^ i dont have operational definitions and im just recently diving into postmodernist analysis of folklore & mythology and compared "universal best practices" and uniform facism
-
this is not to commit the error of "volkisch idealism" of course
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.