"The threat model and economics of federated systems devolve to concentrating trust in the hands of a few, while missing out on the scale advantages of purely centralized solutions." This article is making me have a think.https://fieldnotes.resistant.tech/federation-is-the-worst-of-all-worlds/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @gordonbrander
I wanted federated models like mastodon to "win" but every time I use them it takes a lot of energy to convince myself that they can. So I'm guessing they won't. And the more I think about it and experiment, the less I want them to.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist
Email is federated, so existence proof it can work.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gordonbrander
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 Retweeted 💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 added,
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 @generativist4/ Meanwhile, I'm a sophisticated computer user who thinks endlessly about the harmful interactions between social media, surveillance capitalism, and the attention economy. I care about privacy — my own and everyone else's. And...I still use fucking Gmail.Show this thread2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist @gordonbrander
Although, I guess that gets a bit off topic. The central thrust though is agreement with OP: I'm not even sure it's more private. It could be but the trust model almost guarantees a pretty big exploitable surface.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
That said...I still very much want to be wrong.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.