My near-contradictory default favors both Fiorina *and* Abramowitz. Sampled unconditionally over the set of all beliefs and without offering identity or recall cues, people generally agree. But since we're not in that world, we increasingly disagree for pathological reasons.
-
Show this thread
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 Retweeted 💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫
(Basically, I still have cognitive worker-threads processing my own sleep-deprived response to @paulg's tweet from yesterday,)https://twitter.com/generativist/status/1201291186159394816 …
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 added,
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 @generativist
1/ I think PG is wrong. But, I think this take and his previous ones in the same vein illustrate an error that,
i) everyone is prone to;
ii) no one is trying to solve because it demands thinking 'intersubjectively' (very deliberate usage here), which is real damn hard to do. https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1201164712106434560 …
Show this thread
12:11 PM - 2 Dec 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.