2/ As to (i), in case it wasn't obvious, Paul Graham is asserting that the NYT is increasingly less neutral. To make it more explicit, see this previous tweets, herehttps://twitter.com/paulg/status/1196747587845574657 …
-
-
13/ The latter — identity-less presentation — is something I increasingly think *everyone* gets wrong.
Show this thread -
14/ PG drew some pretty bad inferences because social cognition — being faster and more integrated — caused him to process certain words as identities and out-groups, coloring his downstream perceptions and resulting quality of deliberation.
Show this thread -
15/ And guess what? The same mechanisms cause you to make similar mistakes, as they do for me. And, that *is* a problem because identity cues are so terribly reliable now that careful deliberation affords little boosting.
: "Just take the shortcut, it's fine."Show this thread -
16/ Polarization begets segmentation; segmentation begs polarization. The set of shared beliefs vanishes rapidly. Perception of ideological bias becomes omnipresent.
Show this thread -
17. I'm not sure what the solution to that is. I have some things I'm working on, but seriously — it's hard and, despite mediums of new scale, it's not a new problem.
Show this thread -
18/ But, imagine if PG had said, "listen, I'm bad at processing information given identity cues [as is everyone]. I just start reading between non-existent lines and get terribly confused and angry [as does everyone]. Can you help me evaluate what's going on more effectively?"
Show this thread -
19/ I would think this is a wonderful project (okay, I'm obviously biased), and I wouldn't care if PG had said it — I think that need does exist! But, because PG did say it my first instinct is some variant of, "shut up we don't need a Verrit by Peter Thiel" solution.
Show this thread -
20/ And that's a problem because I'm almost sure technologists *not* in his particularly sycophantic orbit have the same reaction, which creates this weird deterrence space around the need.
Show this thread -
21/ I'm not saying we should strip identity from political discussion. That would be foolish. But, presentation does matter and if one presentation inhibits reception of important information (as it did for PG) while another facilitates it, wouldn't you want the latter?
Show this thread -
22/ Or to put it differently, if I had written this thread under an alt in the vernacular of HackerNews bros — some boisterous mixture of NNT, PG, and Ayn Rand — would you have been as likely to listen to me?
Show this thread -
TL;DR(A): "If I owned a newspaper, I would simply report an unbiased sample of harms subject to correction by social intervention."
Show this thread -
TL;DR(B): I'm pretty sure PG just wants the "paper of record" to reflect his priors and identity, as do we all.
Show this thread -
P.S. To make this more concrete, consider a lot of the discourse around "white privilege." During 2016, there were a few clips interviewing some random white rural person reacting angrily to the premise of white privilege.https://twitter.com/generativist/status/1201291209563656192 …
Show this thread -
People used to thinking in that framework reacted by shitposted derisively and vitriolicly about the "rubes" reaction. You saw the same response to Hillbilly Elegy, too. (I hesitate to use the later as an example, because I didn't think it was good.)
Show this thread -
Thing is, if you're talking about the unconditional expectation of white v black people in the US, it's hard to deny the disparity technically captured by the term white privilege. (Unless you're explicitly racist, as a fuckload of people are.)
Show this thread -
But, the distributions are wide. No, not every black person is worse off than every white person. If you present everything as if they were, you're going to alien a lot of people who quickly learn to associate "white privilege" with "bullshit." Presentation matters.
Show this thread -
Oh, P.P.S., this *is* a problem I am working on from various angles, so if you're a technologist who wants to build or a VC/angel who doesn't want to create the next panopticon / prior confirmation engine, my DMs are open.
Show this thread -
P.P.P.S related for my
#phdlife-heavy followers, https://twitter.com/profmusgrave/status/1201192398124191751?s=21 …https://twitter.com/profmusgrave/status/1201192398124191751 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.