Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
generativist's profile
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫
 💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫
@generativist

Tweets

 💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫

@generativist

...

Palo Alto, CA
jbn.abreka.com
Joined May 2013

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

       💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 Retweeted Paul Graham

      1/ I think PG is wrong. But, I think this take and his previous ones in the same vein illustrate an error that, i) everyone is prone to; ii) no one is trying to solve because it demands thinking 'intersubjectively' (very deliberate usage here), which is real damn hard to do.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1201164712106434560 …

       💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 added,

      Paul GrahamVerified account @paulg
      Startup idea for whoever wants it: Now that formerly neutral(ish) "newspapers of record" have been forced to pick a side to avoid going out of business, there may be room for a new publication to serve that need. Can't say for sure it will work, but it's a beachhead.
      2 replies 1 retweet 19 likes
      Show this thread
    2.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

       💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 Retweeted Paul Graham

      2/ As to (i), in case it wasn't obvious, Paul Graham is asserting that the NYT is increasingly less neutral. To make it more explicit, see this previous tweets, herehttps://twitter.com/paulg/status/1196747587845574657 …

       💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 added,

      Paul GrahamVerified account @paulg
      Replying to @joaquinlife @VitalikButerin
      One piece of quantifiable evidence of the decline in journalism is the word-frequency data showing the NYT's dramatic shift to the left over the past 5 years. You don't shift that fast simply because the truth did. Ergo it must have come at the expense of truth.
      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      Show this thread
    3.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

       💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 Retweeted Paul Graham

      3/ and here,https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1196767257344593920 …

       💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 added,

      Paul GrahamVerified account @paulg
      Replying to @joaquinlife
      pic.twitter.com/x8mTvoghnb
      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      Show this thread
    4.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      4/ The idea that a shift in vernacular comes at the expense of truth is fashionable nonsense *about* nonsense. Changes in language accompany both cultural shifts and scientific revolutions. His evidence is pitifully weak and merely exposes his own biases.pic.twitter.com/GOXXTQVq1w

      google ngrams for information theory showing a dramatic rise in the late 40s.
      google ngrams for "sokal afair" showing a dramatic rise in the early 90s
      1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes
      Show this thread
    5.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      5/ BUT, in doing so, he allows us to interrogate a few things in (what I hope is) a useful way. I'm going to assume that pg considers *objective* reporting useful, a concern we share. (He didn't use that word.)

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      Show this thread
    6.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      6/ The thing is, as anyone who has ever spent time doing any optimization knows, the specification of an objective function is... ...really important. And it's something people almost always leave unspecified when demanding objective news.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Show this thread
    7.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      7/ One idealized objective function would demand stories sampled with respect to harm as a weight. A looming war is important; a fist fight at McDonalds is not. Trouble is, most events lie between these two extremes.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Show this thread
       💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      8/ (There's also the matter of applying some non-linear transformation to the weights prior to sampling because attention is finite and diffuse attention often precludes robust social signal detection — that's why attention-hijacking works so well for agenda setting.)

      4:05 PM - 1 Dec 2019
      • 1 Like
      • Eli Sennesh
      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          9/ Anyways, that objective function? It's well-characterized by ideology, the cognitive tool every one of us uses (whether we admit it or not) to navigate our socio-political information environment. It's a tool for judgment.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        3.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          10/ Paul Graham's objective function as venture capitalist with a near religious following is probably quite different than yours and mind. That's not me saying he's wrong generally, but his beliefs are subject to very different selective pressures than mine and most yours.

          1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
          Show this thread
        4.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          11/ Given OPs use of 'neutral' and the previous posts which mistakenly conflated evolving language with "a dramatic shift to the left," it seems like his prescribed objective function demands, i) an unbiased sample for attention allocation; ii) identity-less presentation.

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
          Show this thread
        5.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          12/ The former I want desperately. (And am slowly working on.) But, it's a remarkably challenging socio-technical problem where good solutions are mostly less wrong ones with lots of uncertainty. (E.g. descriptive representation w.r.t. one trait isn't going to get the job done.)

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        6.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          13/ The latter — identity-less presentation — is something I increasingly think *everyone* gets wrong.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        7.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          14/ PG drew some pretty bad inferences because social cognition — being faster and more integrated — caused him to process certain words as identities and out-groups, coloring his downstream perceptions and resulting quality of deliberation.

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
          Show this thread
        8.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          15/ And guess what? The same mechanisms cause you to make similar mistakes, as they do for me. And, that *is* a problem because identity cues are so terribly reliable now that careful deliberation affords little boosting. 🧠: "Just take the shortcut, it's fine."

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
          Show this thread
        9.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          16/ Polarization begets segmentation; segmentation begs polarization. The set of shared beliefs vanishes rapidly. Perception of ideological bias becomes omnipresent.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        10.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          17. I'm not sure what the solution to that is. I have some things I'm working on, but seriously — it's hard and, despite mediums of new scale, it's not a new problem.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        11.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          18/ But, imagine if PG had said, "listen, I'm bad at processing information given identity cues [as is everyone]. I just start reading between non-existent lines and get terribly confused and angry [as does everyone]. Can you help me evaluate what's going on more effectively?"

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        12.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          19/ I would think this is a wonderful project (okay, I'm obviously biased), and I wouldn't care if PG had said it — I think that need does exist! But, because PG did say it my first instinct is some variant of, "shut up we don't need a Verrit by Peter Thiel" solution.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        13.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          20/ And that's a problem because I'm almost sure technologists *not* in his particularly sycophantic orbit have the same reaction, which creates this weird deterrence space around the need.

          2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Show this thread
        14.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          21/ I'm not saying we should strip identity from political discussion. That would be foolish. But, presentation does matter and if one presentation inhibits reception of important information (as it did for PG) while another facilitates it, wouldn't you want the latter?

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        15.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          22/ Or to put it differently, if I had written this thread under an alt in the vernacular of HackerNews bros — some boisterous mixture of NNT, PG, and Ayn Rand — would you have been as likely to listen to me?

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
          Show this thread
        16.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          TL;DR(A): "If I owned a newspaper, I would simply report an unbiased sample of harms subject to correction by social intervention."

          1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
          Show this thread
        17.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          TL;DR(B): I'm pretty sure PG just wants the "paper of record" to reflect his priors and identity, as do we all.

          1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
          Show this thread
        18.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

           💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 Retweeted  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫

          P.S. To make this more concrete, consider a lot of the discourse around "white privilege." During 2016, there were a few clips interviewing some random white rural person reacting angrily to the premise of white privilege.https://twitter.com/generativist/status/1201291209563656192 …

           💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 added,

           💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 @generativist
          22/ Or to put it differently, if I had written this thread under an alt in the vernacular of HackerNews bros — some boisterous mixture of NNT, PG, and Ayn Rand — would you have been as likely to listen to me?
          Show this thread
          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        19.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          People used to thinking in that framework reacted by shitposted derisively and vitriolicly about the "rubes" reaction. You saw the same response to Hillbilly Elegy, too. (I hesitate to use the later as an example, because I didn't think it was good.)

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        20.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Thing is, if you're talking about the unconditional expectation of white v black people in the US, it's hard to deny the disparity technically captured by the term white privilege. (Unless you're explicitly racist, as a fuckload of people are.)

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        21.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          But, the distributions are wide. No, not every black person is worse off than every white person. If you present everything as if they were, you're going to alien a lot of people who quickly learn to associate "white privilege" with "bullshit." Presentation matters.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
          Show this thread
        22.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

          Oh, P.P.S., this *is* a problem I am working on from various angles, so if you're a technologist who wants to build or a VC/angel who doesn't want to create the next panopticon / prior confirmation engine, my DMs are open.

          1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes
          Show this thread
        23.  💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫‏ @generativist 1 Dec 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation

           💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 Retweeted Paul Musgrave 🍕

          P.P.P.S related for my #phdlife-heavy followers, https://twitter.com/profmusgrave/status/1201192398124191751?s=21 …https://twitter.com/profmusgrave/status/1201192398124191751 …

           💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops  💫 added,

          Paul Musgrave 🍕Verified account @profmusgrave
          Another way of thinking about this is that academics shouldn’t treat knowledge as terra nullius or, worse, assume their own knowledge inherently preempt others’ claims
          Show this thread
          1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
          Show this thread
        24. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info