Bigtable certainly costs a lot more when you need it always online, not just for a batch job, eh?pic.twitter.com/oCjyyVvsOX
-
Show this thread
-
Me: Whatever I'll just hack together a few gRPC-based servers that manage some SSTables or something as intermediaries for maximum cost savings.
: Yea. You definitely want to write the data management layer. Smart move, bud.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
-
Replying to @Randy_Au
That’s sorta how I’m leaning semi-seriously haha. Just trying to convince myself not to ply the role of Dr. Frankenstein...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @generativist
^^;;; I'm on the UXR team for a bunch of storage products incl GCS/BT... so yeah, this is a somewhat common-ish-y use case.... Data Transfer is also a thing but not quite a complete product yet in some ways
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Randy_Au
Oh didn’t realize that. Nice!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @generativist
so yeah if you happen to have uh.. comments about bigtable, spanner, sql, GCS, datatransfer, redis, memcache, filestore.... that'd be me or my teammates
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Randy_Au @generativist
I didnt know this and spend so much time trying to sell my team on big table so I'm gonna abuse this knowledge at some point and maybe ask you a bunch of questions
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @heatherklus @generativist
just remember I'm on the UX research team for it. so if something is frustrating, confusing, unusuable, etc on the UI/API/CLI that's me. The team of Eng/product folk who actively build and implement the thing are my primary stakeholders2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Oh ps the gcloud cli is why I use it over aws — it delighted me.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

