Utopias are silly for many reasons but the necessity of stasis has to be one of the most obvious ones. Which is why it’s weird that the assumption of permanent struggle — the very fuel of an adaptive future — is so damn easy to forget.
-
Show this thread
-
Tbh there’s almost a dangerous trap here for ppl who need a cohesive explanation, be it ideology or something really weird and meta about belief systems themselves. And, you’re not going to find “the right one” for the former. They’re dynamic projections of shifting sands.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
Ah shit wait did I just grok
@m_older’s#narrativedisorder on twitter by while spinning one about the things I know? That would be funny.2 replies 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
Cc:
@chaosprime@Aelkus@Brett_Fujioka@eigenrobot, I bet one of you will have some good dead people words that make this point better (besides database animals).2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @generativist @chaosprime and
Any utopia defined statically solves an equation against an immediately obsolete time stamp. You have to solve it at the relational level. Utopia is defined by how it identifies and solves problems, not by having a solution for all problems currently privileged by the writer.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mykola @generativist and
(tldr: any utopia contingent upon the current properties of its members is not a utopia it’s a time bomb.)
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

