Don't get me wrong, I hope it is and I'm working on that problem now! But, I'm starting to get the impression that at the limit of what's possible given most mediums' social architectures as they are now, substantial reductions come with some pretty ugly side-effects.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Related Hot Take: Interacting with a >=1 million follower account is not a social experience. It's entertainment, press release ingestion, or mass media consumption. We just get confused because we mix it up with the social interactions on this website.
Show this thread -
But, an account that can fan out a million messages a pop (even if its not implemented that way), induces gross distortions in the fabric of attention on *social* media. One of which is they become visible Schelling points and collision spaces for different groups.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is too complex a thought to be considered a “hot take”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The trick is to realize that we're imperfect holograms of each other, and it isn't really 1-to-very-many but part-of-self-to-other-resonant-parts-of-self. Single source origination of ideas is an illusion. Enable multi-variate collectives to acts as one, reduce redundancy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.