1/ I've heard this theory a lot in the last few years. I believe it's true. Recently, I've had a lot of fearful moments with RL work thinking, "they're just going to eat our lunch, aren't they?"https://twitter.com/seanjtaylor/status/1143578006721638400 …
4/ Now, I'm mostly excited about doing a lot more RL/ABM fusion work. Something I'm sure @seanjtaylor has had the pleasure of doing at a serious level :)
-
-
Why do you think RL will invalidate ABM? They are different views of the same thing. ABM is bottom up, RL is top-down and often quite brittle. One thing to to also note is that for non-trivial RL, just as much hand-tuning is put into the reward/scorer as is required for ABM.
-
'Obviated' was the wrong word. A better phrase would have been "crowded out" in the competition for tools and tool-builders. But yes, fundamentally, I agree with you: they are complementary methods.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.