1/ If you look at journal papers as pull requests to a larger (graphical) repository of knowledge, reviewers are wildly overworked maintainers and null-findings are #WONTFIX labels.
That doesn't seem like a healthy structure.
-
Show this thread
-
2/ Alternatively: let's estimate the contribution of some work using a pass/fail assignment generated by approximately three people; then, let's use the structure of the accepted contributions to assign authority; then, let's use authority to allocate future scholarly attention.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @generativist
Isn't that how an influencer is determined, but without the peer review?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @RDub2
Yes.
...there are problems with every system 
2:32 PM - 31 May 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.