It is not, clearly, a scientific story! And so in our western materialist lens we say "That story is not scientific therefore you should feel shame for telling it." And like, fuck that noise, right? What an a paucity of stories we'd have if that was our only convention!
-
Show this thread
-
So, what is magic? There are so many ways to talk about it, but one that I've been slowly chipping away at (and which Unwritten made explicit for me) is that magic is the process of becoming an active narrator of the story that is your self, your society, your reality.
1 reply 7 retweets 81 likesShow this thread -
Why, then, does magic seek the maximization of the number of meaningful coincidences in life? Because every one of those coincidences is a doorway to a different state. The more coincidences you see, the richer and more complex a story you can tell.
1 reply 6 retweets 72 likesShow this thread -
And y'all you're not going to tell a scientific story about your self. When you try to you cut off all the squishy icky confusing parts of your subjective experience as somehow not real, and you alienate yourself from yourself.
2 replies 3 retweets 53 likesShow this thread -
And so one way to tell that you are in a "magical" state is you just start noticing the adjacencies. "That phrase I just heard in this tv show, someone said that same thing in the bodega earlier." "This idea 'feels like' that idea somehow." "These tarot cards describe me."
1 reply 4 retweets 43 likesShow this thread -
Things like Tarot, Astrology, Ouiji boards etc all serve the same purpose - they are generators of arbitrary adjacency. That is what they are for. To dismiss them because the adjacencies they generate don't follow scientific narrative convention is to misunderstand everything.
4 replies 13 retweets 83 likesShow this thread -
Now, it's also possible to have too many adjacencies. When you look around you and everything connects to everything you've gone beyond magic and into a sort of mystical state that is honestly really impossible to control.
1 reply 0 retweets 52 likesShow this thread -
("Science" even has explanations for this - paranoia, schizophrenia, apophenia - but again, we don't have to accept science's explanations. And frankly, science would have no idea what to do with a transcendental mystical story except to say "No.")
1 reply 1 retweet 41 likesShow this thread -
So yeah, that's the relationship between coincidences, the concept of 'adjacency' and stories. You are a story you are telling yourself. You can choose any next state that you can see a connection to. The more connections you see, the richer your self becomes.
7 replies 6 retweets 74 likesShow this thread -
myk is teetering Retweeted myk is teetering
heh, this thread continues here a few months later:https://twitter.com/mykola/status/1130584359810097162 …
myk is teetering added,
3 replies 0 retweets 26 likesShow this thread
Twitter's algo has stopped showing me your stuff as frequently, and I am annoyed I missed this!
-
-
Replying to @generativist
lol I must have been too critical of jack. this is why I do a chronological feed, if I miss something it's because I wasn't there. ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mykola
I follow to many people for that and rely on algo + lots of private lists. (Have stopped using the lists a bit though. Time to resume.)
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.