My favorite thing about evolutionary descriptions of unobserved or unobservable processes is that you can use it to bestow the illusion of formal rigor to any fantastic story you damn well please. (This is and is not criticism.)
-
-
Replying to @generativist
I’ve really started to dig into Simondon for this. He presents such a better vocab for this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Nick_Lalone
I’m unfamiliar. Can you point me to something?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @generativist
bad primer: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilbert_Simondon#Individuation_and_technology … Book: On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects (Univocal) https://www.amazon.com/dp/1517904870/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_FDh5CbNP9ZZ1W …
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.