Tangentially: The thing about belief systems that I think is pathologically under-emphasized is that you can agree completely within a context but disagree w.r.t. the relative salience of a context and the latter matters way more, perceptually.https://twitter.com/NelsonMRosario/status/1130200492842323969 …
-
-
The example that I found more compelling was abortion. Fiorina used the GSS data to say, "see, over these seven prompts, people generally agree, in aggregate." Except, no, there is no reason to think "in the wild" people find each particular context equally important.
-
We're kind watching that unfold in real-time now, too. Political agents are carving up social groups by signalling which particular context matters to them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.