Tangentially: The thing about belief systems that I think is pathologically under-emphasized is that you can agree completely within a context but disagree w.r.t. the relative salience of a context and the latter matters way more, perceptually.https://twitter.com/NelsonMRosario/status/1130200492842323969 …
-
-
So, when people think, "oh those two people are talking past each other, but they really agree," they're making a mistake. They agree over an artificial, constrained projection; but their mental models disagree, as evidenced by expressive propensities.
-
It's also the place where so much fuckery hides because it's the hardest to quantify easily. E.g. GSS/ANES asks "What's your opinion on [X]?" it doesn't observe what beliefs you express and sample from in your life. It measures the wrong thing.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.