Tangentially: The thing about belief systems that I think is pathologically under-emphasized is that you can agree completely within a context but disagree w.r.t. the relative salience of a context and the latter matters way more, perceptually.https://twitter.com/NelsonMRosario/status/1130200492842323969 …
-
-
But, which ones you select convey information about the relationships *between* beliefs, which is what we really care more about. It's how we navigate implications. But, it's hard to share those things, so we look for cues in selection.
-
So, when people think, "oh those two people are talking past each other, but they really agree," they're making a mistake. They agree over an artificial, constrained projection; but their mental models disagree, as evidenced by expressive propensities.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.