Hot take: Metcalfe’s Law is missing a negative cubic term or something that doesn’t have an appreciable effect until n is very large.
(That’s wrong in that either the value of the network doesn’t decrease because the cost is born by users or in that it’s true only in the discounted value that incorporates future expectations...but there is something in there I think.)
-
-
Is this in the case of n log n substituted for n^2 for large values of n?
-
Maybe? I think I need to think about it more. Ore review actual lit on it because I think it’s a weak heuristic but I have no idea.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.