Which problem do you think I should spend my foreseeable future trying to help solve?
-
-
Replying to @generativist
So, you're asking if you should allocate your attention to science collaboration, or if you should collaborate with other science types on attention allocation?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BobKerns
Basically, yes.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist
I'll expect a paper titled "Mechanisms of Attention Allocation in Scientific Collaborations".
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BobKerns
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 Retweeted ██████████
So yea, my whole philosophy is pretty unoriginal and largely captured by Simon back in the 70s. Collaboration is a HUGE attention suck, and I'm not sure it's done well?https://twitter.com/microjudgments/status/1101568922011095041 …
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @generativist
Getting the right info in front of the user was a recurring theme in my career. I'll give it some more thought, but one facet that comes to mind is the importance of context and salience, and how to recognize, represent, and work with them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BobKerns @generativist
R. V. Guha's Stanford thesis on microtheories is relevant. I don't have a link immediately at hand.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I'll check it out thouhg, thanks!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.