Science labs with their small teams and constantly shifting objectives seem like a great place to apply Agile principles! Any academics out there who have tried it? Computer scientists? Machine learners? Data scientists? Go share your insights in @EpiEllie's thread!

https://twitter.com/EpiEllie/status/1118609108876369921 …
-
-
Replying to @kareem_carr @EpiEllie
I can't work by other principles, at least for ABMs and stuff. Every time someone proposes trying to use a waterfall methodology or something, I know, 1. I'm not going to fit in there team; 2. I'm going to be skeptical of what they build.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Although — and mostly flippantly — I also like, http://programming-motherfucker.com/
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @generativist @EpiEllie
I do a mix of GTD (general framework for moving goals to tasks), Bullet journaling (day-to-day battle planning), Kanban (project tracking), Agile (process-level improvements) and even Maslow's hierarchy of needs for making the jump from wants/needs/purpose to goals.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
It's a scary system. I would not teach it to anybody as they might think I'm a weirdo.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
I think you're a weirdo already, but this just is the type of painstaking methodology that I think works — the kind that focuses on process not forecasts pushed beyond the horizon of predictability.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.