There is a very good book that I have not read, do not know if it exists, and, want to read, on rules for boundary-spanners/information-brokers.
-
-
Replying to @generativist @TheAnnaGat
(I'd actually like to work on this more some day. Especially with my friend
@sommerjo, who has done INCREDIBLE things because he is good at / has successfully navigated that role in a very variegated domain.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @generativist @sommerjo
Oh wonderful. Happy to join the discussion. I'd like to say that "trust may be our most important currency" but I really don't want to invent the blockchain here
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TheAnnaGat
My dissertation is mostly about how trust as an expectation of reliability induces socially-patterned errors in our beliefs, so you're in good company :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist
Oh. Can trust also lead to error correction / mitigation?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheAnnaGat
My model is a lot more abstract than that so I wouldn't want to mislead but buy implication, I think: yes. The act of entertaining an idea in good faith willfully discards social cues that your brain automatically uses, almost necessarily assuming trust, even if for a moment!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @generativist
I'm realising in a way this is also about that “Three Prologues to Language” by Anna Gát https://link.medium.com/WNBJyQDRxV - creating distrustful non-cooperative public language --> distrust between individuals too
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheAnnaGat
I already booked marked it a few days ago for post defense pleasure reading.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @TheAnnaGat @generativist
This whole "Twitter friendship", this was just a ruse!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.