I kinda like this one. People have alts anyway. Making an <anon:uid=0> type account that presents no social cues allows expression without stereotyping. And, if the credit (likes/follows) doesn't accrue to a specific account, it may allow expressivity *while* lowering abuse.https://twitter.com/generativist/status/1113111129323057152 …
Global / in tag channels / in replies.
A way to let people say stuff without attaching identity.
(And, since it's an abuse vector, a
to disable notifs or automute anons)
-
-
My initial take is that it's value would largely be a safe way for people to shout into the void. Since it is extremely abuse-prone, most users would probably sensibly not look at anon content.
-
That's mostly where I think the value is, too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.