Yes. Yes, there is... I've obviously done the first, and am working on the last. I've also done a bit on wargaming, and I think there are a bunch of possibilities. e.g. computationally generated after-action reviews for each individual/team in a human in the loop wargame.
-
-
Replying to @brentauble
I also think that the generativity world does a better job than straight-up ABMs at thinking in terms of interesting state-spaces rather than focusing on pruned-down model mechanics, which seems closer to how qualitative wargames are run.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @badnetworker @brentauble
We really need a different medium for CSS discussions. I feel like there are so many great starts that get lost in the torrent of ideas on here.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @generativist @badnetworker
We did have the Slack channel, that kinda died off
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brentauble @generativist
I don't know if Slack is any *less* transient, though.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @badnetworker @brentauble
Yea. After defense I hope I remember this thread. I've been toying with some new mediums and it may be useful for us.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
*ducks head in* I know some IR folks have had luck with group-run blogs for longer-form idea swapping.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
We did that too, once. Initial flurry of activity, then it just kinda...died :(
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think the challenge is that we need a medium that: * gets our attention regularly (Twitter, FB, & email are things looked at frequently, maybe Slack or Discord) * are persistent * allow collaborative content building Twitter is bad at the last 2
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
#3 is the part I'm designing for
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
But yes, 1 and 2 are citical.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.