1/ I'm sure the STS folks can say this better but, Single-author papers or projects aren't interdisciplinary. They can't be.
-
-
So, I absolutely *would* call your work interdisciplinary. But, I mostly wish there was a different word. Like, if you're able to do it well as a single author, I think it says something about the disciplinary boundaries that demands emphasis.
-
If you force interdisciplinary work to be by def. multi-author then you might trap us in Conway's law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_law … With people contributing separate 'parts' to paper & never integrating it into 1 coherent whole & one mind. I wouldn't even call that interdisciplinary.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I rather like your hot-take, actually. I know that you are swamped with writing right now. But is there anyway I could convince you to contribute a slightly fleshed out version of this hot-take as a guest post for TheEGG?
-
Your view of interdisciplinarity might be a nice follow up to my discussion of motivatiogenesis: https://egtheory.wordpress.com/2019/03/15/motivatiogenesis/ … And your view is much more interesting and challenging to engage with than my perspective.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.