1/ Oh, also, just to emphasize: I really appreciate DMs of questions or statements you're afraid to ask/make publicly. IDK if I'll be able to answer them — and, the expressive value may be useful for you by itself! — but for social science things, they definitely help me!https://twitter.com/generativist/status/1111666288332410880 …
-
Show this thread
-
💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 Retweeted Katie Mack
2/ Now that I think about it, maybe people in
#scicomm should do something like@AstroKatie, where you pin some FAQs.https://twitter.com/AstroKatie/status/650917238292115456 …💥 (wannabe) Ƀreaker of (the Bad) Loops 💫 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
3/ Physicists get frustrated by the deluge of pot-induced theories of everything takes because the discipline is REALLY developed. Like, no, you didn't figure out something important and vitally missing last night while watching The Expanse on Amazon.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
4/ But social science is very very different. And, for a variety of reasons, it's painfully easy to miss an important perspective or aspect of a social issue. Your "dumb question" is often a valuable statement or interpretation!
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @generativist
brb gonna smoke a joint and rewatch the expanse and totally understand how to apply Luhmann’s social systems thinking to online culture and its all your fault
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.