When I was an arrogant little shit teenager, I would have read this enthusiastically. Now, I can't imagine why I would have enjoyed it then. But, I finally get it -- it was deliberately written for and marketed to that other me.
-
-
Show this thread
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I might, if only to pad my goodreads book challenge list; 128 pages. Although I still find it somewhat sad, Dennett and, to a much lesser degree, Dawkins had a couple of good and important points in the early days, nearly twenty years ago (wtf), but now look where we are at...
-
Yea. When public intellectuals start getting high on their own supply, things get weird fast.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can't even parse that cover.
-
I think it requires teenage arrogance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I love Hitchens and Hawkins.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It does appear ironic when aggressive atheism becomes another form of religion. Not all successful scientists are thoroughgoing reductionists or believe science can answer ontological questions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ahh Atheism always fair game for ridicule.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What do you dislike about the book ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.